To:
Viper I didnt get a chance to tell you yesterday THANK YOU for sending this out. I called them and told them I was going to report them to the Better Business Bureau of IL because out here the POW/MIA flag is SERIOUS business. They can't even fly it out here in front of liquor establishments! So I talked to some Jennifer girl and she did the ole tap and dance about "we don't pick the designs." I told her very bluntly that they may not pick the designs but the Better Business Bureau will receive multiple complaints from our veterans out here in IL. and that she was going to have a nationwide boycott on her hands. She got the point then! She said she would talk to the owner about "the situation." Thanks so much for you and Master Sgt bringing it to our attention!
RESPECT is deserved by every Veteran-whether they are home or not. POW/MIA you are not forgotten! To:
Reliably, the GoE gets their panties in a bunch over a t-shirt, while igoring the shameful treatment of our veterans at Walter Reed.
Eagles up yours! To:
I've been to Walter Reed many, many times Frankie boy. I can guaran-damn-tee you have not, nor have you ever considered visiting a wounded soldier or military member. I'm always asking the wounded troops there how they're being treated, and the response is almost always positive. The care our troops receive at Walter Reed is exemplary, as it should be.
The only shameful treatment our troops receive comes religiously from you and your moonbat pals. To:
"The care our troops receive at Walter Reed is exemplary, " !!!
If you can't even admit that there have been some problems, you are clueless, living under a rock, or worse. This confirms my theory that this is not a veteran's advocacy org, but rather a purely political vehicle for a fascist agenda. To:
Geez Coop, what planet do you live on?
Behind the door of Army Spec. Jeremy Duncan's room, part of the wall is torn and hangs in the air, weighted down with black mold. When the wounded combat engineer stands in his shower and looks up, he can see the bathtub on the floor above through a rotted hole. The entire building, constructed between the world wars, often smells like greasy carry-out. Signs of neglect are everywhere: mouse droppings, belly-up cockroaches, stained carpets, cheap mattresses. If that's "exemplary," I'd hate to see poor! http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/17/AR2007021701172.html To:
You're right Frank. If a Democrat had been in office when the problems were exposed we'd never hear the end of it.
To:
If you can’t even admit that there have been some problems Of course I can. However, you cannot in any way, shape or form back up your pathetic, hate-filled, woefully partisan claim that their care is "shameful." Again, the only shameful treatment of our troops come from you and your ilk. And you know it. To:
So I take it you've been to Walter Reed, Sam? Or the Mologne House? Fisher House? I read the Post's hit piece, just like everyone else. The difference is, I've seen the ENTIRE picture, not some myopic, partisan view.
That's what planet I live on. And moonbats aren't welcome. To:
"Again, the only shameful treatment of our troops come from you and your ilk."
Yeah I guess you're right, Coop. We're the ones that sent them into battle with too small a force, with insufficient armor, without a coherent post-hostility plan and insufficient resources to care for them when they return injured. And now we're the one sending them on three, four tours in Iraq and then extending those tours. And we're the ones issuing the stop-loss orders so they can't leave the service. How despicable of us troop haters! To:
Hit piece!? That "hit piece" is going to win a Pulitzer.
To:
Hey Frankie, I notice you skipped right over my assertion that you've never been to Walter Reed or any military/veterans hospital. It's tragically ironic how armpit stains like yourself don't give a flying hoot about our troops until they see a political opening.
But keep screaming on here about how partisan we are. Those whines are almost as effective as when you accuse us of being racist and hate-filled as you simultaneously call us "fascists." Hey, Frankie, why don't we take a good long look at Kaiser Permanente's history of medical care? Whatcha think? http://www.my3cents.com/showReview.cgi?id=20929 Hey, here's one in your area. Been with Kaiser for 26 years but this will be the last year. Penalized for choosing personal physician. Service sucks. They'll let you just die rather than give you an appointment for a serious condition. What the heck is wrong with you Kaiser people, Frankie?!? That's shameful!! Won't even let a person pick their own physician? SHAMEFUL!! And look at this crap: State and federal regulators confirmed that Kaiser, unlike other transplant centers, had no systematic way of handling complaints. http://www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,1540,2131039,00.asp At least Walter Reed fired (undeservedly) a commander and others. Your sorry, hate-filled arse is still employed by this SHAMEFUL outfit! To:
Yes, hit piece. Pulitzer? Like I'm supposed to be impressed. That impresses me about as much as terrorist Yasser Arafat winning a Nobel Peace Prize.
To:
Yeah I guess you’re right, Coop. We’re the ones that sent them into battle with too small a force, with insufficient armor, without a coherent post-hostility plan and insufficient resources to care for them when they return injured. And now we’re the one sending them on three, four tours in Iraq and then extending those tours. And we’re the ones issuing the stop-loss orders so they can’t leave the service. Yes, Sam, you are to blame. Those are your Congressional reps at work. BRAC (you are familiar with that term, aren't you Sweetheart?) started long before this president. And it sped up during the administration of the Impeached Rapist. But it's funny. I don't recall a single liberal whining back then about insufficient resources or plans. Only when it becomes convenient. But just wait, when the military gets back up to strength you hypocritical moonbats will be leading the charge to cut forces -- again. To:
Zing! That was a good one my friend, I'll give you that. But back to the issue at hand - if it was a hit piece, Bush and Co. would have ignored it. Instead they replaced the generals in charge and Bush gave a speech dedicated to the issue. A hit piece indeed!
To:
Viper
Getting in a bit late here but thank you from Rolling Thunder! Anything I can do to help please let me know!! Soapbox IF NOT US, WHO? IF NOT NOW, WHEN? To:
Oh please, BRAC has nothing to do with sending an insufficient force into battle without the proper body armor or armored vehicles. Base Realignment and Closure is a necessary process to increase efficiency and adjust to the end of the Cold War.
"I don’t recall a single liberal whining back then about insufficient resources or plans." Well you're not going to if you were listening to the mainstream media back then, which helped Bush hype the public into going to war. Dissenting voices were largely ignored or ridiculed. Unfortunately they had to be proven right by this fiasco in order to be heard. To:
If it were NOT a hit piece, the Washington Post would have been running routine articles on the tremendous care our soldiers receive on a daily basis. It did not. One has to go elsewhere to find that.
Quality of care at Walter Reed not at issue http://www.healthcareitnews.com/story.cms?id=7201 It was not the medical care received; even the soldier who worked with the Washington Post told The Associated Press last month, that he received "good medical treatment from Walter Reed’s doctors and nurses. And since you conveniently ignored my question, I'll assume that you have not visited Walter Reed and are therefore are at a tremendous disadvantage (as anyone would be, relying only on Post reporters). Dana Priest and her little friends could have written about how Mologne House gives the appearance (inside and out) of a four-star hotel... or how the breakthroughs in prosthetics have been remarkable... but no, it's much better to get a Pulitzer than boost morale, right? To:
Dissenting voices proven right?!? ROTFLMAO!! Okay, here we go. Tell me now how Saddam didn't have WMD. ROTFL!!! gasp, wheeze
To:
If Saddam had WMD, why didn't he use them?
To:
It's not the emergency medical care that's the issue. By all accounts it is state of the art. The problem is some - not all - of the warehouses where soldiers go to recover. In the cases cited by the Post, the soldiers have been abandoned in deplorable conditions. I'd call that news. And do you think the ones interviewed by the Post made that stuff up? You mean you're calling our troops LIARS! Shame on you, Code Pink Commie!
"If it were NOT a hit piece, the Washington Post would have been running routine articles on the tremendous care our soldiers receive on a daily basis." First of all, I've seen and read plenty of good news about advanced surgeries and the like performed at W.R. But for the sake of argument, let's say you're right and the media has never reported on good military health care. So what? Someone doing their job is NOT NEWS! That's why we don't see Iraq stories about all these wonderful schools you guys are always harping about. If a child can't get to that shiny new school without being obliterated by a car bomb along with 50 other people, then that new school is not going to make the front page. Got it? BREAKING: Trains running on time! MSNBC Exlusive: Postal Service delivers mail! To:
Good point Frank. And if he had them, why don't Bush and Cheney tell us about it? You'd think they'd want to get the word out on that, wouldn't you? And if he had them, so what? He's not going to give his crown jewels to terrorists, who are just as likely to use them on him as on us. And he's certainly not stupid enough to attack us. That man's sole objective was staying in power. Sure, he rattled his sword every now and then, but he's not going to go full monte and provoke an outright war with the West.
To:
Frank
Let me put this as simply as possible. There are those of us who feel that disrespect for the POW/MIA Flag is right there beside burning an American Flag or spitting on a wounded vet/soldier and it will not be tolorated, period. I'm sure even you hold something sacred although I have no clue as to what that may be?!!?!?!?!? If you believe nothing else I have written here Frank, believe this. This is NOT a subject you want to test us on! Sam Your right if a dem were in office we never would have heard the end of it because they would be so busy trying to cover up and making excuses that we could not have gotten a word in edge wise. That is assuming of course the media would have made as big a deal out of it as they did under Bush. Yet another glaring example of you vs us. President Bush took responsibilty and set out to correct the problem ASAP To:
You can test deez nuts, soapbox. And as long as we have the first amendment in place, there ain't jack you can do if someone burns and American flag. You're one to talk given the way you drag America through the muck every day with this fascist ranting.
To:
Yawn. Hey where's MIKEBSUFFOLK!? I'm ready for some REAL craziness.
To:
Yeah, and somebody get USMCMailman on the horn while they're at it.
To:
Well it's quitting time boys, time to hit the old watering hole. I'll tip one back for each you, MIKEBSUFFOLK and Hotbox.
To:
Sam
Ref your post#9 above. Had Clinton not gutted the armed forces we would not be having the problems you mention. In fact there are those who believe we may not be in this situation at all had he not made said cuts. Frank First amendment? Use it while you can, Hillary is trying to stiffle that one too. But that's O.K. with you isn't it Frank. The libs are never wrong and the further to the left the better. Right? And please know Frank there IS much I can and am more than willing to do should you or your kind burn a flag, American OR POW/MIA in my presence. Iam also man enough to suffer the consequences for my actions. But of course you are counting on the fascist(as your kind calls them)police to protect you. Please tell me how I have been dragging America through the muck? And ranting? I think I've been rather respectful. As far as testing you, as I said on a previous thread, You name the time and place, bring Sam and John with you and I'll come alone. See there are things I am willing to pay a price for. Question is are you ? Sam Tipping one back for me and my buddy Mike? Assuming you have two or even one for yourself that would put you over the legal limit. Hope you are planning to take a cab rather than making our public streets more dangerous than those in Baghdad. And again neither of you has yet to answer the simple question, is it that you can't or you won't or more likly that the prospect of being wrong scares you to death. So one last time, now pay attention; WHAT IF YOU ARE WRONG? To:
Soapy, you never responded on the other post so I will cut and paste here:
Wrong about what exactly? Terrorists want to attack and kill us, but there has been absolutely no evidence that a military strategy is effective. All of the attacks that have been stopped were a result of good law enforcement. Invading Iraq and creating an Al-Qaeda training camp is exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. To:
HEY FRANK...BOO!!
To:
SOAPBOX: HOW'S YOUR WIFE DOING?
To:
Frank,
It's Soapbox not Soapy, just a modicum of respect would be nice. The terrorists have publicly stated time and time again, " Covert to Islam or die." You choose to believe this is simply some kind of rhetoric designed to make us cower to them. I choose to believe they are serious. They turn their kids into walking bombs Frank and then look at it as a blessing! "No evidence that a military strategy is effective, all attacks that have been stopped were a result of good law enforcement" May I ask how you know these things Frank? Do you have some inside conection to the FBI, ATF, DOD or some other organization that you haven't shared with us? As a friend of mine once told me , absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. I know it's hard to believe and you probably can't stand the fact that the press DOES NOT KNOW EVERYTHING. Which I think is a good thing, and you don't I'm sure. You nor I have any clue as to what may or may not be going on in the intel community, nor should we. With todays rapid communication the enemy would know our movements before the troops even tied their boots. So regardless of where you get your "news" rest assured you ain't getting the whole story most of the time. I kinda figured you were smart enough to know that. Troop support and security trump the public's right to know everytime in my book. To:
MikeB
She's awke not too sure about alert yet. Thanx for asking! To:
And mike don't be given up the info on my marital status here in public. Got 3 beauties on the date nite section I'm tryin' to woo !!!!!
To:
SOAPBOX: GLAD TO HEAR SHE IS FINE! SORRY ABOUT THE SLIP UP BUT I THINK JOE IS GIVING YOU A RUN FOR YOUR MONEY
To:
Here's my two-cents worth: Dear friends: I sincerely hope that you can stop for a moment and ponder the impact that an organization which can muster 30,000 volunteers from all over this great country IN A MATTER OF DAYS--before it even BECAME an organization--to stand between the sacred Vietnam Memorial Wall and an assortment of misguided individuals who would seek to dishonor it. What's happened? We--who believe in and adhere to the mission statement that you can (and should) read at www.gatheringofeagles.org--have had ENOUGH!!! We will go wherever and do whatever it takes to stop those who would dishonor those sacred symbols paid for by the American blood that still lies mixed in the sands of Normandy, Iwo Jima; American blood that cakes--now black with age--the hidden edges of Korean rice paddies; American blood that has crystallized and become part of the hateful, devouring desert of Iraq; AMERICAN BLOOD. . . Get it!? I think you do. You wouldn't have become successful businessmen by ignoring common sense. Once again--and please read this very carefully from a member of an organization that has grown from that initial 30,000 to an association that now (in less than four months!) numbers in the high six digits--we will not tolerate the desecration of another of our most sacred symbols--the POW-MIA graphic--by anyone.
EAGLES UP!!! To:
CHUCK: YOUR 2 CENTS WAS WORTH A MILLION DOLLARS. WELL SAID
To:
I agree with MikeB and well said Chuck
To:
Hey Frank you like to burn american flags ? come burn mine in Texas and I will exercise my right to protect my property bet you won't burn another one
To:
I have an american flag that I bought before 9-11 it has flown in every place I have lived since then even here in Iraq I will let no harm come to that flag in any shape or fashion
To:
Hey sammy, let me clear up your confusion.
I've actually been to Iraq as a Hardcore, Patriotic SOLDIER! I had sufficient body armor, and most of the Hardcore, Patriotic SOLDIERS you hear about going back for a second or third (or more) time are doing so because they are VOLUNTEERING to go back! But hey, what can we expect from a gutless anti-militaty extremist like you who secretly wears a rag on his head in honor of his ragheaded terrorist buddies over in Iraq! Sorry sammy; YOU LOSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To:
Chuck,
Thanx for knowing what it means to care about something . Many , I afraid, just don't get it. Paul Thank you for your service! To:
Joe66 Sorry, you'll always be 66 to me! Do you really believe these people would have the guts to burn one of our flags in your presence? Not even if you handed them the match! Now standing behind a police line maybe, but within arms reach of one of us with no barriers, not a chance!
To:
Eagles, you do realize Frank is some 13 year old, snot nosed, pimple face kid playing internet tough guy in his parents basement right? I mean cmon...how many adults throw out a witty comeback as "You can test deez nuts".
No reason to go into a battle of whits with some bonehead that is completely unarmed and spineless I sure am glad I am on the side of honor with you Eagles, you know how to stick to your guns, respectfully tell someone to go take a long walk of a short pier and can intellectually rub their noses in their own fecal matter they so conveniently throw at our President and troops in the name of "PEACE" may it forever echo EAGLES UP!! To:
Brian Thanx for the kind words and honest advice. I'm praying you are wrong about Frank although your point is well taken and a valid one. Guess that's why he won't take me up on my offer to get toghether, mom won't let him out after dark.
To:
I appreciate the nice comments, Soapbox, Mike, and Joe66; however, I hope nobody thinks I was "preaching to the choir"! That was a "cut 'n' paste" of the email I sent to Zazzle or Frazzle or whatever.
To:
Brian I Know, I know but I just can't help trying to enlighten these two or three, I've lost count, just one more time.
On the subject of WMDs. It was publicly reported in June of 2006 that 500 munitons had been located in Iraq. These munitions contained Mustard & Sarin gases. These are classified as Chemical Weapons and are outlawed AND are internationaly considered WMDs. While not the stock piles that the internationl intel agencies had hope to locate they are never the less WMDs located in Iraq! So Frank how many canisters of Sarin or Mustard gas would there need to be in your town square before you decided it was time to take a long weekend at aunt Betty's house in the country? Want more? O.K. Alilbrahim al-Tikriti a former commander under Saddam Hussein has stated that there is no question that Saddam had other such agents(weapons) shipped to Syria in the days and even hours prior to our assault on Baghdad! Your next logical question would be, why were they not used against American Troops? According to al-Tikriti; Saddam knew that sooner or latter the international community would come for the weapons. He knew he had lied but did not want to loose his legitimacy with the Arab Nationalists. After so many denials using the WMDs or leaving them to be easily found would only LEGITIMIZE President Bush. Saddam wanted and predicted that those who opposed the war would rally around him since Bush's war would all be based on a lie about WMDs. Seems he was correct on that one. For extra credit Frank and Sam too, The commander of the Fedayeen militia also stated that Iraq sponsored Palestinian terrorists "for the longest time" both materially and logisticaly. Saddam's support for Al-Qaeda was limited since his vision was for a secular Arab empire while Al-qaeda promotes an Islamic one. Still they share the same "short term enemy." That would be you and me Frank, and yes you too Sam. Saddam's vision, HMMMMMM, Guess that explains all those gassed Kurds. Mustard gas if I recall !!! And finally when asked if the United States put Saddam Hussein into power, The man who's command dealt with chemical and biological weopons & who was a Ba'athist said " this is absolutely ludicrous. May want to take a hard look at the KGB. We were busy training the Taliban. I'll give you a big ooooppps on that one guys but they were fighting Russians at the time. So there you have some facts to chew on fellas. I'm sure you will tell me that Ali lbrahim was tortured and made to tell these lies. Wait, your side says torture doesn't work , So I guess he's just fibbin' to make Bush look good. Riiiiiiiiiiight! Steppindown; for now Soapbox IF NOT US, WHO? IF NOT NOW, WHEN? To:
Yeah, Chuck I'm sure there's 30,000-plus "Eagles" all rallying around the flag and $hit ready to go, given how it's the same 4 mo-tards like you that keep posting every 5 minutes against us lef-tard code-pink commies! I exclude my buddy George from your crew though. Despite his ravings, he has been, relatively speaking, a gentleman, and he reminds me of many beloved family members whose convictions -- however misguided and confused I believe they are -- I have never doubted sincerity-wise. George has both fought overseas and on the homefront -- against the KKK of all things! -- and that is all right in my book. Despite his incoherent ranting online, I think he's probably alright in real life. I think we could get along just fine and have a fun debate over a couple of frosty cold ones. The rest of you guys though ... YIKES!
To:
Chuck Don't release you secrets!!!! Anywho every once in awhile the choir needs a soloist.
Could somebody tell me what this cuttin' and pastin' is all about. Fell like I'm walking down an alley on the Southside of Chicago. Damn sometimes I crack myself up! Actually met Bad Bad Leroy Brown. Use to hang out at Buddy Guy's Club on Wabash. No really ask Gabi if you think I'm lyin' . Heard he just passed away. Great guy, huge smile. God rest his soul To:
SADDAM HAD WMD!!! SADDAM HAD WMD!!! Yawn. All your neo-con, GOP talking-point excuses don't prove nothing. Give me an official report and we can talk. Even GWB's boys couldn't come up with proof, and you KNOW they tried to come up with some. After all, it's their a$$es that get burned in the history books, and perhaps in the RIGHT-NOW books. As in, THEY'RE GOING TO JAIL! The Child Prince is in BIG trouble because the American people are pi$$ed, and WE know how to reg-u-la-a-a-te! EAGLES UUUUP!
To:
"Troop support and security trump the public’s right to know everytime in my book."
You're a sucker if you believe that. But what else is new. But seriously, you guys are against everything that America was based on...personal freedom, free of foreign entanglements. You guys want to conquer the world and mold it in your image. Not on my time and not with my tax dollars! Go back to your holes and fantasize about having a nude wrestling match with OBL. No holds barred! To:
Hey sammy, let me clear up some more of your confusion.
We know for a FACT that your buddy sodom had WMD's; after all, that wasn't exactly pixie dust that killed all those Kurds back in 1988. Plus, if there were no WMD's, then WHY were the UN weapons inspectors who were in Iraq prior to the war prevented and blocked from going to a lot of places by your buddy sodom's bloodbaath party goons? WHAT DID HE HAVE TO HIDE????? To:
No one's saying he didn't have WMD 20 YEARS AGO. Heck, it was Reagan and Bush 1 who looked the other way when he gassed the Kurds and Iranians. Classy. It was W who ordered the inspectors out of Iraq before the war. If he had given them more time, they could have saved us from this fiasco. But that was never an actual option. The decision had already been made. Bush waited for them to conduct some cursory inspections so he could say "we tried," then pulled the plug and went on with his fait accompli. And besides, WMD were never the reason we went into Iraq. They were just a convenient bogeyman Cheney, Wolfowitz, Perle and the rest of the chickenhawk neoCONs waved in front of a country still reeling from 9/11. The main reasons for the invasion were W's vanity and the neoCONs' desire to teach the world a lesson about American power. And they did that all right. Thanks to them we're seen as an incompetent, impotent giant that is a force of evil. And don't go thinking I "hate America." I love my country. I just hate what this group of ideological extremists have done to it. George W Bush is NOT America.
To:
Sam and/or Frank,
My post #46 above was in direct response to your statements in #19-21 so stop with the yawning, #49 cute as it is, but it seems that no amount of factual information will ever convince you to even consider the possibilty that you could be mistaken, even alittle bit. Guess you are the type that actually has to get hit in the face with a brick to relize it may hurt. Your faliure to even address this information indicates that your unsubstantiated hatered for President Bush is the true driving force behind your ranting. By caling me and others, neocons, you prove to have no knowledge of of us what so ever. See there is nothing liberal about me. Never has been probably never will be. As I have stated before, I am so far right that I make Reagan look like a new dealer! By definition boys you are the fascists. I / we support and participate in free and fair elections! You on the other hand appear to support dictators. I / we support a multi party system which is completly contradictory to the meaning of fasism. Those on your side of the street are the supporters of Castro, Chavez and Che. Frank, I Believe in personal freedom as much if not more than you ever will but I relize it comes hand in hand with personal RESPONSIBILTY. And being free of foreign entanglements? Well 9-11 and even the Free Trade act kinda rulled that one out. And conquering the world ain't the point either smart guy. How about ending genocide how about allowing others to have at least a fraction of the freedom and self determination that you enjoy . Yea, we are real bad people alright ! Hell under Saddam's rule you would have lost your head for your anti government rhetoric! Yes we have & will continue to make mistakes but please show me of a country that has done more for mankind world wide. And Sam, "had we given the inspectors more time" How much more time Sam? How many more UN resolutions? 6 weeks, 6 months 6 years! One more resolution or a hundred more? How many? Please provide me with a number, any number ! "Besides WMDs were never the reason we went to Iraq" Well your a bit out of step with what 98.5 of your buddies who think that was the presidents "excuse." So you must be a "no blood for oil" guy, right Sam. Well about half of your side of the street says the war is why gas prices are so high while the other half believes the war is keeping them low. Which is it ? If we were in Iraq simply for the oil it would be so much easier ! And Sam I do not think you hate America, I just belive you have a hate for people who disagree with your view on any level. And one last thought. I wonder where we would be today had Mr Clinton taken the action that he himself said should be taken. That's right, he was busy rolling around on the floor of the Oval Office. If you think you hate what a group of ideological extremists have done to OUR country I can hardly wait to see what you think about it if a group of Islamic extremists have their way. See Sam we pray we are wrong while you refuse to accept even the possibility that we are right. Yet another glaring difference between us. Steppin' down; for now Soapbox IF NOT US, WHO? IF NOT NOW, WHEN? To:
Chuck in reference to # 45 you weren't preaching to the choir you just said something that needed to be said
To:
Hey 66
Notice Frank's post # 50 above? Looks like he believes his right to know is more important than your safty. Should be but somehow I'm not surprised. Time to clean out the Frank, I mean the litter box. Sleep well Joe and thanx again for everything ! Tell everyone they are in our prayers. It's rack time, I'm a real bear if I don't get my 9 hours. To:
Frank and Sam:
Just a thought, and not an original one: Before you decide to burn the American flag, do us all a favor and wrap yourself in it first! Coop, Soapbox, Chuck, Joe66 - you guys all crack me up. I stay out of these banters as I really don't know much. Just a civilian, proud of my country and our military. You guys just tear these left wingers to pieces. Thanks for the entertainment!! To:
LOL anytime patriot
To:
I’m sure there’s 30,000-plus "Eagles all rallying around the flag and $hit ready to go, given how it’s the same 4 mo-tards like you that keep posting every 5 minutes against us lef-tard code-pink commies!
Actually sambo...you forget one small thing buddy..its called the "Silent Majority" Yah...it took the lefts prodding and poking to finally piss off enough people to get 30k, I guarantee there were 10 to 100x that..thats the deal with a silent majority..we remain silent until its time to act Buy a cheaply made pressure cooker from wallyworld...put some water in it, then stick it on the stove..keep adding heat, keep poking an prodding and thumbing your nose at it, until finally it lets loose, the 30k that showed up against your ilk in DC were the slow puff puff puffing of the pressure relief valve, those that chose to be vocal..but deep down inside this country they are backed by the force of millions of us..and if you and your ilk keep adding the heat it will BLOW UP IN YOUR FACE The sleeping giant has awakened and its not very happy my brother... Eagles UP!!!!!!!!!! To:
Brian
Very well done !! I think you made the situation easy enough for them to understand. Well I can hope can't I ? To:
Here's the petition I signed to help, I hope supporters here will do the same. http://www.sldn.org/ltb.html
To:
Greeting, Coop, MikeB, Paul, Brian, Chuck, Patriot007, Mom in Ct.& every last Eagles who supports the troops & their mission.
Hope to see you at Walter Reed Hospital on June 29th to send a special Gathering of Eagles "Face to Face" greetings to the "Ladies" of Code Pink. I do plan on "Ranting" my strong displeasure to the Mothers of" Mall Rats "for their constant "Support the Troops , But Not The War"" at wounded soldiers ,and their familys. .Please join myself, Larry Hoffa, MikeB, Bubba & our familys with the proud members of Free Republic at this "Mini" warm up for the Fall "Super Rally" in DC. On June 30 we will join my brothers & sisters at the front gate of Fort Monmouth NJ. to again "rant" at the anti-America collection of supporters of the "Hate America First,Last & always" I have no further desire to attempt to debate a team of BS artists, Trools & sockpuppets, I will say only that as one simple soldier within the G.O.E. I find the constant dribble of these two moonbat clowns pointless. My brothers & Sisters With great respect for you I say these two moonbats are nothing more then a well supported team of members of the anti-Bush movement , sent here to the G.O.E. home page to play out a plan to make the G.O.E. home page a platform to espouse the moonbat movements "Talking Points" as they find no other place on earth to see them online , other then the "Rants" in their own twisted BS online blogs. May I say to you, Frank & Sam..Bite me, I need no "Suck Up" from eather of you. May I suggest the G.O.E. deny the moonbats "Up Yours Eagles" team any further use of the G.O.E. home page for the spread of their endless efforts help us all give up, face "Facts", stay quiet, & not show up in the Fall in DC in any large numbers. If you agree please push "Flush" Gathering of Eagles rules for moonbats Trools & sockpuppets RULE # 1...NEVER , EVER, FEED THE TROOLS.& SOCKPUPPETS....LET THEM STARVE !!. RULE #2....SEE RULE # 1 NOTE: FRANK & SAM WILL"RAVE" ON , THEN FIND ANOTHER PLACE TO PLAY "TRUE AMERICANS". TO ALL MY G.O.E. BROTHERS & SISTERS I OFFER THIS AS A SUGGESTING, PLEASE DO NOT BE OFFENDED, AS I AM A "CONFUSED" "GRUMPLY OLD GRAND DAD" SEE EACH OF YOU ON THE G.O.E. COUNTER RALLY LINE LOOKING INTO THE FACES OF THE "REAL" MOONBATS. PS FRANK & SAM & SUPPORT TEAM WITH NO RESPECT, BITE ME. To:
good points George
To:
Gathering of Eagles Web Staff
What say you?. The many true Americans who view the G.O.E. home page are not only offended by the rants of Moonbat Trools & Sockpuppets , they may assume we are nothing more then a moonbat debateing team, reather then a Troops & Mission action team. With great respect for all your hard work to insure we have a quality "Eagles Nest" I value you prospective on Trools & Sockpuppets who invade our home page with nothing more to offer then the well known talking points of the very people we formed together to defeat. With Great Respect I remain a loyal soldier within the brotherhood of the Gathering of Eagles. The Troops, The Troops, Nothing But The Troops. |
|
